Reasonable adjustment failures by sector
Ryan Hoare · Founder, TryMosaic · Last reviewed
This guide is part of our complete guide to reasonable adjustments tribunal cases.
Why sector shapes failure
The duty under the Equality Act 2010 is the same everywhere, but the ways organisations fail it are not. What is easy to adjust at a desk is hard on a night rota; what a large office absorbs without noticing, a six-person kitchen feels immediately. Knowing your sector's failure pattern lets you fix the process where it will actually break.
[TODO: verify] The sector breakdowns below are qualitative. Frequency data by sector will be added once our tribunal dataset is complete, built from published employment tribunal judgments.
Physical and shift-based work: logistics, retail, construction, hospitality
- The barriers here sit around rotas and the physical environment: inflexible shift patterns, targets applied without adjustment during returns to work, and equipment or premises changes that stall in procurement.
- Safety requirements are sometimes cited as blanket reasons to refuse, when the workable question is how an adjustment can be made safely rather than whether to adjust at all.
- Every staff or manager handover is a point where an informally-held adjustment can lapse, and these sectors have more handovers. Recording matters more here, not less.
Office-based work
- Barriers are less visible: workload, concentration, sensory environment, communication styles. Failures cluster around disclosure, where employees do not ask because they cannot see how the conversation will go, and around requests dismissed as preferences.
- The pattern to prepare for is the slow one: vague acknowledgement, no timescale, and a request that ages quietly until the employee stops asking or leaves.
Clinical and care settings
- Patient safety and service continuity constrain some adjustments, and rota complexity makes changes harder to implement than to agree.
- The failure to guard against is treating the constraint as the end of the conversation rather than the start: on-call, rota patterns, supervision and non-clinical time all offer room to adjust within safe staffing.
What every sector shares
Across all of it, the same four process failures from our disputes guide recur: unreasoned refusals, unimplemented agreements, adjustments lost in changes, and delay. Sector changes which failure arrives first, not whether the process gaps exist. The role-by-role guides in this cluster cover what good adjustments look like in each setting.
This guide is general guidance, not legal advice. For advice on your specific obligations, speak to an employment law specialist or ACAS.
If you are evaluating vendors, book a short TryMosaic demo and put the questions above to us first.
References
- Reasonable adjustments at work (ACAS)
- Equality Act 2010, section 20: duty to make adjustments (legislation.gov.uk)
- Health and Safety Executive (HSE)
- Employment tribunals (GOV.UK)
Related guidance
Frequently asked questions
Do reasonable adjustment obligations differ by sector?
The legal duty is the same in every sector. What differs is what is reasonable in the circumstances: the size of the employer, the nature of the work, and real safety constraints all shape which adjustments are practicable in a given role.
Can safety rules justify refusing an adjustment?
Safety requirements shape how an adjustment is made, and occasionally rule a specific option out, but a blanket safety refusal without examining alternatives is one of the most common failure patterns in physical sectors. The question is how to adjust safely, not whether safety ends the duty.
Which sectors see the most adjustment failures?
We are not publishing comparative figures until our tribunal dataset is verified. Qualitatively, the risks in physical and shift-based work sit around rotas, equipment and handovers, while in office and clinical settings they sit around disclosure, workload and delay.
Why do shift-based workplaces struggle more with continuity?
Higher turnover among both staff and managers means more handovers, and each handover is a point where an informally-held adjustment can vanish. A recorded adjustment that follows the employee survives turnover; one that lives in a manager's memory does not.
How should we use sector patterns practically?
Prepare for your likely barriers in advance: pre-approve common adjustments for your kind of work, brief managers on the requests they are most likely to receive, and put process guards where your sector tends to fail, whether that is refusal reasoning, implementation tracking or response times.
Published · Last updated · This guide will next be reviewed by .
TryMosaic is the system of record for workplace adjustments under the Equality Act 2010.